ADD AI Governance Deck
Board briefing 01 / 06

Slide 01

AI Is Not a Purchasing Problem

CEO + CFO + CTO + Board
Core claim

If procurement and finance make the first real decision, the company is optimizing contract terms before it understands capability.

AI changes the work itself. It changes staffing mix, operating speed, decision quality, and what the organization can ship. That makes it an operating decision before it becomes a buying decision.

Board risk Wrong decision owner means the company buys cost control and misses capability.

Slide 02

The Printer Workflow Is Now the Problem

Process failure
01

Team identifies leverage

Engineering or operations finds a tool that could materially change throughput, cycle time, or workflow quality.

02

Commercial gate takes over

Procurement and finance narrow the field on cost, vendor size, contract structure, and renewal comfort.

03

Domain review arrives too late

The people who understand the work are invited to comment after the real decision is mostly made.

Why this fails

Capability gets screened out before it is understood. A tool that looks disciplined on a spreadsheet can still be the expensive choice if it misses the actual workflow.

The market will not wait for a buying process built for printers.

Timing pressure

Slide 03

Cheap AI Can Be the Expensive Choice

Economics
Seat price saved
$40

Per user, per month. It looks disciplined in a budget review.

Output lost
2x-3x

The wrong tool can show up as slower engineering output, weaker operations leverage, and deferred process change.

Real result
Negative

The company saves on licenses and loses on throughput.

CFO lens

Open source is not automatically the cheaper option. Compute, integration time, maintenance, and support can exceed the price of a commercial API with better operating fit.

Board question

Are we measuring AI spend, or are we measuring capability gained per dollar?

Slide 04

A Slow Buying Cycle Locks in Yesterday's Answer

Market cadence
Quarter 1

Tool looks expensive

It gets evaluated against today's budget baseline and yesterday's buying habits.

Quarter 2

Capability shifts

Models improve, prices move, and workflows change faster than the contract process can absorb.

Quarter 3

Competitor compounds learning

You are still living inside an obsolete evaluation while someone else is already stacking evidence.

A two-year lock-in on the wrong capability is not prudence. It is delayed recognition of a bad decision.

Board implication

Slide 05

Finance Keeps Capital Control. Domain Leaders Move First.

Operating model
01

Domain leaders test real work

Engineering, operations, and functional owners validate tools against live workflows and real data.

02

Business case gets written

Output change, implementation cost, timing, risk, and dependencies are made explicit.

03

Control functions do their job

Finance evaluates economics. Security sets guardrails. Legal reviews terms. Procurement structures the deal.

What changes

Domain truth comes first. AI capability gets judged against work, not generic feature grids.

What does not

Finance still owns budgets. Security still owns boundaries. Procurement still owns contracts.

Slide 06

Reset Decision Rights Before the Next AI Contract Is Signed

Decision now
Board action

Approve a domain-first AI evaluation model.

Name executive owners by function. Require workflow-based testing before commercial selection. Force every proposal to show capability, economics, security conditions, and timing.

30-day action One governance reset before the next major AI contract closes.

A CFO who understands AI is an asset. A CFO forced to choose AI capabilities without domain evidence is an expensive governance failure.

Closing line